From 3718a9cdd48ea4e57024b4c433cf2c55a2e91c53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bjarke Berg <mail@bergmania.dk>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 09:47:18 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "Ignore test of lazy locks"

This reverts commit e03ff2661b9bbd5c36e79dda092616f85039ad72.
---
 .../Umbraco.Infrastructure/Persistence/LocksTests.cs             | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/Umbraco.Tests.Integration/Umbraco.Infrastructure/Persistence/LocksTests.cs b/tests/Umbraco.Tests.Integration/Umbraco.Infrastructure/Persistence/LocksTests.cs
index 8ae6818aeb..88b48dfaae 100644
--- a/tests/Umbraco.Tests.Integration/Umbraco.Infrastructure/Persistence/LocksTests.cs
+++ b/tests/Umbraco.Tests.Integration/Umbraco.Infrastructure/Persistence/LocksTests.cs
@@ -125,7 +125,6 @@ public class LocksTests : UmbracoIntegrationTest
         }
     }
 
-    [NUnit.Framework.Ignore("We currently do not have a way to force lazy locks")]
     [Test]
     public void GivenNonEagerLocking_WhenNoDbIsAccessed_ThenNoSqlIsExecuted()
     {