From 57985cd0b2989c31d99ece2fa2531d6edf8f2e55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: agrath <unknown@kiln.example.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:39:02 -1300
Subject: [PATCH] Publish notification/workflow fails when using Distributed
 Calls, performedUser is null - check for null and replace with admin user

---
 umbraco/cms/Actions/Action.cs | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/umbraco/cms/Actions/Action.cs b/umbraco/cms/Actions/Action.cs
index 9c483705f8..6f38cc4988 100644
--- a/umbraco/cms/Actions/Action.cs
+++ b/umbraco/cms/Actions/Action.cs
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ namespace umbraco.BusinessLogic.Actions
     /// </summary>
     public class Action
     {
-        private static List<IAction> _actions = new List<IAction>();        
+        private static List<IAction> _actions = new List<IAction>();
         private static List<IActionHandler> _actionHandlers = new List<IActionHandler>();
 
         private static readonly List<string> _actionJSReference = new List<string>();
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ namespace umbraco.BusinessLogic.Actions
                 _actions.Clear();
                 _actionHandlers.Clear();
                 RegisterIActions();
-                RegisterIActionHandlers(); 
+                RegisterIActionHandlers();
             }
         }
 
@@ -147,6 +147,14 @@ namespace umbraco.BusinessLogic.Actions
             {
                 u = User.GetUser(0);
             }
+            if (u == null)
+            {
+                //GE 2012-02-29
+                //user will be null when using distributed calls
+                //can't easily get the real publishing user to bubble all the way through the distributed call framework
+                //so just check for it and set it to admin, so at least the notification gets sent
+                u = User.GetUser(0);
+            }
             Notification.GetNotifications(d, u, action);
         }