diff --git a/src/Umbraco.Web/Models/PublishedProperty.cs b/src/Umbraco.Web/Models/PublishedProperty.cs
deleted file mode 100644
index f715df7450..0000000000
--- a/src/Umbraco.Web/Models/PublishedProperty.cs
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
-using System;
-using System.Collections.Generic;
-using System.Linq;
-using Umbraco.Core.Models;
-using Umbraco.Core.Models.PublishedContent;
-using Umbraco.Web.Composing;
-
-namespace Umbraco.Web.Models
-{
- public static class PublishedProperty
- {
- ///
- /// Maps a collection of Property to a collection of IPublishedProperty for a specified collection of PublishedPropertyType.
- ///
- /// The published property types.
- /// The properties.
- /// A mapping function.
- /// A collection of IPublishedProperty corresponding to the collection of PublishedPropertyType
- /// and taking values from the collection of Property.
- /// Ensures that all conversions took place correctly.
- internal static IEnumerable MapProperties(
- IEnumerable propertyTypes, IEnumerable properties,
- Func map)
- {
- var propertyEditors = Current.PropertyEditors;
- var dataTypeService = Current.Services.DataTypeService;
-
- // TODO: not dealing with variants
- // but the entire thing should die anyways
-
- return propertyTypes.Select(x =>
- {
- var p = properties.SingleOrDefault(xx => xx.Alias == x.Alias);
- var v = p == null || p.GetValue() == null ? null : p.GetValue();
- if (v != null)
- {
- var e = propertyEditors[x.EditorAlias];
-
- // We are converting to string, even for database values which are integer or
- // DateTime, which is not optimum. Doing differently would require that we have a way to tell
- // whether the conversion to XML string changes something or not... which we don't, and we
- // don't want to implement it as PropertyValueEditor.ConvertDbToXml/String should die anyway.
-
- // Don't think about improving the situation here: this is a corner case and the real
- // thing to do is to get rig of PropertyValueEditor.ConvertDbToXml/String.
-
- // Use ConvertDbToString to keep it simple, although everywhere we use ConvertDbToXml and
- // nothing ensures that the two methods are consistent.
-
- if (e != null)
- v = e.GetValueEditor().ConvertDbToString(p.PropertyType, v, dataTypeService);
- }
-
- return map(x, v);
- });
- }
- }
-}
diff --git a/src/Umbraco.Web/PublishedCache/PublishedMember.cs b/src/Umbraco.Web/PublishedCache/PublishedMember.cs
index eec973c182..08e00c1f17 100644
--- a/src/Umbraco.Web/PublishedCache/PublishedMember.cs
+++ b/src/Umbraco.Web/PublishedCache/PublishedMember.cs
@@ -35,16 +35,13 @@ namespace Umbraco.Web.PublishedCache
// if they are not part of the member type properties - in which case they are created as
// simple raw properties - which are completely invariant
- var _properties = PublishedProperty.MapProperties(_publishedMemberType.PropertyTypes, _member.Properties,
- (t, v) => new RawValueProperty(t, this, v ?? string.Empty));
-
var properties = new List();
foreach (var propertyType in _publishedMemberType.PropertyTypes)
{
var property = _member.Properties[propertyType.Alias];
if (property == null) continue;
- //properties.Add(new FooProperty(propertyType, this, property.Values));
+ properties.Add(new RawValueProperty(propertyType, this, property.GetValue()));
}
EnsureMemberProperties(properties);
_properties = properties.ToArray();
diff --git a/src/Umbraco.Web/Umbraco.Web.csproj b/src/Umbraco.Web/Umbraco.Web.csproj
index 28337e6d2c..a190d6711c 100755
--- a/src/Umbraco.Web/Umbraco.Web.csproj
+++ b/src/Umbraco.Web/Umbraco.Web.csproj
@@ -775,7 +775,6 @@
-