yv01p/Umbraco-CMS
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Removed cache refreshing code from inside of the ascx control as it is now all handled via business logic.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Shannon Deminick
2013-03-20 22:03:35 +06:00
parent e7a6a29e59
commit aa7fd7bb2b
2 changed files with 2 additions and 34 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

20
src/Umbraco.Web/Cache/CacheRefresherEventHandler.cs
View File

@@ -84,25 +84,7 @@ namespace Umbraco.Web.Cache
/// <param name="sender"></param>
/// <param name="e"></param>
static void ContentTypeServiceSavedContentType(IContentTypeService sender, Core.Events.SaveEventArgs<IContentType> e)
{
//NOTE: This needs to be put in the Service layer...
//var needsContentRefresh = e.SavedEntities.Any(contentType =>
// {
// //before we send the call to update the cache, we need to determine if we need to refresh the xml content
// //in the database. This is to be done when:
// // - a content type changes it's alias
// // - if a content type has it's property removed
// //here we need to check if the alias of the content type changed or if one of the properties was removed.
// var dirty = contentType as IRememberBeingDirty;
// return dirty != null && (dirty.WasPropertyDirty("Alias") || dirty.WasPropertyDirty("HasPropertyTypeBeenRemoved"));
// });
////if we need to refresh the content cache, we need to re-create the xml content in the database before sending out
////the request to refresh the application cache
//ApplicationContext.Current.Services.ContentService.RePublishAll();
//now send the cache refresh call!
{
e.SavedEntities.ForEach(contentType => DistributedCache.Instance.RemoveContentTypeCache(contentType));
}