From e18f73e74cdafdc4d4196eb2d976b344bda3eefb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shannon Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:07:46 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] removes todo --- .../NuCache/DataSource/BTree.ContentNodeKitSerializer.cs | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/Umbraco.Web/PublishedCache/NuCache/DataSource/BTree.ContentNodeKitSerializer.cs b/src/Umbraco.Web/PublishedCache/NuCache/DataSource/BTree.ContentNodeKitSerializer.cs index 142a2c36db..f799869850 100644 --- a/src/Umbraco.Web/PublishedCache/NuCache/DataSource/BTree.ContentNodeKitSerializer.cs +++ b/src/Umbraco.Web/PublishedCache/NuCache/DataSource/BTree.ContentNodeKitSerializer.cs @@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ namespace Umbraco.Web.PublishedCache.NuCache.DataSource PrimitiveSerializer.String.WriteTo(value.Node.Path, stream); PrimitiveSerializer.Int32.WriteTo(value.Node.SortOrder, stream); PrimitiveSerializer.Int32.WriteTo(value.Node.ParentContentId, stream); - //TODO: Why don't we write the FirstChildContentId + NextSiblingContentId? Then we can entirely avoid all overhead when loading on startup? PrimitiveSerializer.DateTime.WriteTo(value.Node.CreateDate, stream); PrimitiveSerializer.Int32.WriteTo(value.Node.CreatorId, stream); PrimitiveSerializer.Int32.WriteTo(value.ContentTypeId, stream);