using System;
using System.Linq;
using Umbraco.Core;
using Umbraco.Core.Composing;
using Umbraco.Core.Models;
using Umbraco.Core.Services;
namespace Umbraco.Tests.Testing
{
public static class ContentBaseExtensions
{
///
/// Set property values by alias with an anonymous object.
///
/// Does not support variants.
public static void PropertyValues(this IContentBase content, object value, string culture = null, string segment = null)
{
if (value == null)
throw new Exception("No properties has been passed in");
var propertyInfos = value.GetType().GetProperties();
foreach (var propertyInfo in propertyInfos)
{
if (content.Properties.TryGetValue(propertyInfo.Name, out var property))
{
property.SetValue(propertyInfo.GetValue(value, null), culture, segment);
//Update item with newly added value
content.Properties.Add(property);
}
else
{
//fixme: Can this ever happen? According to the ctor in ContentBase (EnsurePropertyTypes), all properties will be created based on the content type's property types
// so how can a property not be resolved by the alias on the content.Properties but it can on the content type?
// This maybe can happen if a developer has removed a property with the api and is trying to then set the value of that property again...
// BUT, as it turns out the content.Properties.Remove(...) method is NEVER used, because why and how could it? you never remove a property from
// a content item directly.
var propertyType = ((ContentBase)content).AllPropertyTypes.FirstOrDefault(x => x.Alias == propertyInfo.Name);
if (propertyType == null)
throw new Exception($"The property alias {propertyInfo.Name} is not valid, because no PropertyType with this alias exists");
//Create new Property to add to collection
property = propertyType.CreateProperty();
property.SetValue(propertyInfo.GetValue(value, null), culture, segment);
content.Properties.Add(property);
}
}
}
}
}