using System; using System.Linq; using Umbraco.Core; using Umbraco.Core.Composing; using Umbraco.Core.Models; using Umbraco.Core.Services; namespace Umbraco.Tests.Testing { public static class ContentBaseExtensions { /// /// Set property values by alias with an anonymous object. /// /// Does not support variants. public static void PropertyValues(this IContentBase content, object value, string culture = null, string segment = null) { if (value == null) throw new Exception("No properties has been passed in"); var propertyInfos = value.GetType().GetProperties(); foreach (var propertyInfo in propertyInfos) { if (content.Properties.TryGetValue(propertyInfo.Name, out var property)) { property.SetValue(propertyInfo.GetValue(value, null), culture, segment); //Update item with newly added value content.Properties.Add(property); } else { //fixme: Can this ever happen? According to the ctor in ContentBase (EnsurePropertyTypes), all properties will be created based on the content type's property types // so how can a property not be resolved by the alias on the content.Properties but it can on the content type? // This maybe can happen if a developer has removed a property with the api and is trying to then set the value of that property again... // BUT, as it turns out the content.Properties.Remove(...) method is NEVER used, because why and how could it? you never remove a property from // a content item directly. var propertyType = ((ContentBase)content).AllPropertyTypes.FirstOrDefault(x => x.Alias == propertyInfo.Name); if (propertyType == null) throw new Exception($"The property alias {propertyInfo.Name} is not valid, because no PropertyType with this alias exists"); //Create new Property to add to collection property = propertyType.CreateProperty(); property.SetValue(propertyInfo.GetValue(value, null), culture, segment); content.Properties.Add(property); } } } } }