Files
Umbraco-CMS/src/Umbraco.Web/BatchedDatabaseServerMessenger.cs

162 lines
6.7 KiB
C#

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Web;
using Newtonsoft.Json;
using Umbraco.Core;
using Umbraco.Core.Cache;
using Umbraco.Core.Configuration;
using Umbraco.Core.Sync;
using Umbraco.Web.Routing;
using Umbraco.Core.Logging;
using Umbraco.Core.Persistence;
using Umbraco.Core.Persistence.Dtos;
using Umbraco.Core.Scoping;
using Umbraco.Web.Composing;
using System.ComponentModel;
namespace Umbraco.Web
{
/// <summary>
/// An <see cref="IServerMessenger"/> implementation that works by storing messages in the database.
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// This binds to appropriate umbraco events in order to trigger the Boot(), Sync() & FlushBatch() calls
/// </remarks>
public class BatchedDatabaseServerMessenger : DatabaseServerMessenger
{
private readonly IUmbracoDatabaseFactory _databaseFactory;
[Obsolete("This overload should not be used, enableDistCalls has no effect")]
[EditorBrowsable(EditorBrowsableState.Never)]
public BatchedDatabaseServerMessenger(
IRuntimeState runtime, IUmbracoDatabaseFactory databaseFactory, IScopeProvider scopeProvider, ISqlContext sqlContext, IProfilingLogger proflog, IGlobalSettings globalSettings, bool enableDistCalls, DatabaseServerMessengerOptions options)
: this(runtime, databaseFactory, scopeProvider, sqlContext, proflog, globalSettings, options)
{ }
public BatchedDatabaseServerMessenger(
IRuntimeState runtime, IUmbracoDatabaseFactory databaseFactory, IScopeProvider scopeProvider, ISqlContext sqlContext, IProfilingLogger proflog, IGlobalSettings globalSettings, DatabaseServerMessengerOptions options)
: base(runtime, scopeProvider, sqlContext, proflog, globalSettings, true, options)
{
_databaseFactory = databaseFactory;
}
// invoked by DatabaseServerRegistrarAndMessengerComponent
internal void Startup()
{
UmbracoModule.EndRequest += UmbracoModule_EndRequest;
if (_databaseFactory.CanConnect == false)
{
Logger.Warn<BatchedDatabaseServerMessenger>("Cannot connect to the database, distributed calls will not be enabled for this server.");
}
else
{
Boot();
}
}
private void UmbracoModule_EndRequest(object sender, UmbracoRequestEventArgs e)
{
// will clear the batch - will remain in HttpContext though - that's ok
FlushBatch();
}
protected override void DeliverRemote(ICacheRefresher refresher, MessageType messageType, IEnumerable<object> ids = null, string json = null)
{
var idsA = ids?.ToArray();
Type arrayType;
if (GetArrayType(idsA, out arrayType) == false)
throw new ArgumentException("All items must be of the same type, either int or Guid.", nameof(ids));
BatchMessage(refresher, messageType, idsA, arrayType, json);
}
public void FlushBatch()
{
var batch = GetBatch(false);
if (batch == null) return;
var instructions = batch.SelectMany(x => x.Instructions).ToArray();
batch.Clear();
//Write the instructions but only create JSON blobs with a max instruction count equal to MaxProcessingInstructionCount
using (var scope = ScopeProvider.CreateScope())
{
foreach (var instructionsBatch in instructions.InGroupsOf(Options.MaxProcessingInstructionCount))
{
WriteInstructions(scope, instructionsBatch);
}
scope.Complete();
}
}
private void WriteInstructions(IScope scope, IEnumerable<RefreshInstruction> instructions)
{
var dto = new CacheInstructionDto
{
UtcStamp = DateTime.UtcNow,
Instructions = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(instructions, Formatting.None),
OriginIdentity = LocalIdentity,
InstructionCount = instructions.Sum(x => x.JsonIdCount)
};
scope.Database.Insert(dto);
}
protected ICollection<RefreshInstructionEnvelope> GetBatch(bool create)
{
// try get the http context from the UmbracoContext, we do this because in the case we are launching an async
// thread and we know that the cache refreshers will execute, we will ensure the UmbracoContext and therefore we
// can get the http context from it
var httpContext = (Current.UmbracoContext == null ? null : Current.UmbracoContext.HttpContext)
// if this is null, it could be that an async thread is calling this method that we weren't aware of and the UmbracoContext
// wasn't ensured at the beginning of the thread. We can try to see if the HttpContext.Current is available which might be
// the case if the asp.net synchronization context has kicked in
?? (HttpContext.Current == null ? null : new HttpContextWrapper(HttpContext.Current));
// if no context was found, return null - we cannot not batch
if (httpContext == null) return null;
var key = typeof (BatchedDatabaseServerMessenger).Name;
// no thread-safety here because it'll run in only 1 thread (request) at a time
var batch = (ICollection<RefreshInstructionEnvelope>)httpContext.Items[key];
if (batch == null && create)
httpContext.Items[key] = batch = new List<RefreshInstructionEnvelope>();
return batch;
}
protected void BatchMessage(
ICacheRefresher refresher,
MessageType messageType,
IEnumerable<object> ids = null,
Type idType = null,
string json = null)
{
var batch = GetBatch(true);
var instructions = RefreshInstruction.GetInstructions(refresher, messageType, ids, idType, json);
// batch if we can, else write to DB immediately
if (batch == null)
{
//only write the json blob with a maximum count of the MaxProcessingInstructionCount
using (var scope = ScopeProvider.CreateScope())
{
foreach (var maxBatch in instructions.InGroupsOf(Options.MaxProcessingInstructionCount))
{
WriteInstructions(scope, maxBatch);
}
scope.Complete();
}
}
else
{
batch.Add(new RefreshInstructionEnvelope(refresher, instructions));
}
}
}
}