* Run code cleanup * Finish dotnet format and manual cleanup * Fix according to review Co-authored-by: Zeegaan <nge@umbraco.dk>
33 lines
1.6 KiB
C#
33 lines
1.6 KiB
C#
using Umbraco.Cms.Core.PublishedCache;
|
|
|
|
namespace Umbraco.Cms.Infrastructure.PublishedCache;
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Options class for configuring the <see cref="IPublishedSnapshotService" />
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
public class PublishedSnapshotServiceOptions
|
|
{
|
|
// disabled: prevents the published snapshot from updating and exposing changes
|
|
// or even creating a new published snapshot to see changes, uses old cache = bad
|
|
//
|
|
//// indicates that the snapshot cache should reuse the application request cache
|
|
//// otherwise a new cache object would be created for the snapshot specifically,
|
|
//// which is the default - web boot manager uses this to optimize facades
|
|
// public bool PublishedSnapshotCacheIsApplicationRequestCache;
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// If true this disables the persisted local cache files for content and media
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
/// <remarks>
|
|
/// By default this is false which means umbraco will use locally persisted cache files for reading in all published
|
|
/// content and media on application startup.
|
|
/// The reason for this is to improve startup times because the alternative to populating the published content and
|
|
/// media on application startup is to read
|
|
/// these values from the database. In scenarios where sites are relatively small (below a few thousand nodes) reading
|
|
/// the content/media from the database to populate
|
|
/// the in memory cache isn't that slow and is only marginally slower than reading from the locally persisted cache
|
|
/// files.
|
|
/// </remarks>
|
|
public bool IgnoreLocalDb { get; set; }
|
|
}
|