Refactoring with Claude & Agentic SDLC

The "God Class" Boss Fight

After this refactoring exercise, I feel I can tackle any legacy application written in any computer language. Under proper guidance, Claude is an incredible partner.

Full documentation and details of the refactoring can be found in docs/plans

ContentService Refactoring: Executive Summary

Date: 2025-12-26 Branch: refactor/ContentService Duration: December 19-24, 2025 (6 days) Status: Complete

---

TL;DR

The ContentService refactoring successfully decomposed a 3,823-line monolithic class into a 923-line facade delegating to 7 specialized services. All 9 phases completed with zero behavioral regressions across 234 ContentService tests. Performance improved overall (-4.1%), with major batch operations improving 10-54% while single-item operations showed minimal overhead (<30ms). One performance regression requiring follow-up investigation (HasChildren +142%).

---

1. Original Goals vs. Outcomes

Goal	Target	Achieved	Assessment
Code reduction	~990 lines	923 lines	Exceeded (31% reduction)
Service extraction	5 public + 2 internal	5 public + 2 managers	Met
Backward compatibility	100%	100%	Met
Test regressions	0	0	Met
Performance	No regression	-4.1% overall	Exceeded

---

2. Architecture: Before & After

Before

ContentService (3,823 lines)
├── CRUD operations (~400 lines)
├── Query operations (~250 lines)
├── Version operations (~200 lines)
├── Move/Copy/Sort (~350 lines)
├── Publishing (~1,500 lines)
├── Permissions (~50 lines)
├── Blueprints (~200 lines)
└── Shared infrastructure (~873 lines)

After

ContentService Facade (923 lines)
├── Delegates to:
│   ├── IContentCrudService (806 lines)
│   ├── IContentQueryOperationService (169 lines)
│   ├── IContentVersionOperationService (230 lines)
│   ├── IContentMoveOperationService (605 lines)
│   ├── IContentPublishOperationService (1,758 lines)
│   ├── ContentPermissionManager (117 lines)
│   └── ContentBlueprintManager (373 lines)
└── Orchestrates: MoveToRecycleBin, DeleteOfType

Total implementation lines: 4,981 (vs. 3,823 originally) Note: Increase reflects added tests, XML documentation, and audit logging - not code duplication.

---

3. Phase Execution Summary

Phase	Deliverable	Tests Added	Git Tag	Duration
0	Baseline tests & benchmarks	15 + 33	phase-0-baseline	Day 1
1	ContentCrudService	8	phase-1-crud-extraction	Day 1-2
2	ContentQueryOperationService	15	phase-2-query-extraction	Day 2
3	ContentVersionOperationService	16	phase-3-version-extraction	Day 3
4	ContentMoveOperationService	19	phase-4-move-extraction	Day 4
5	ContentPublishOperationService	16	phase-5-publish-extraction	Day 4
6	ContentPermissionManager	2	phase-6-permission-extraction	Day 5
7	ContentBlueprintManager	5	phase-7-blueprint-extraction	Day 5
8	Facade finalization	6	phase-8-facade-finalization	Day 6

Total new tests: 135 (across all phases)

---

4. Interface Method Distribution

The original IContentService exposed 80+ methods. These were mapped to specialized services:

Service	Method Count	Responsibility
IContentCrudService	21	Create, Read, Save, Delete
IContentQueryOperationService	7	Count, GetByLevel, Paged queries
IContentVersionOperationService	7	GetVersion, Rollback, DeleteVersions
IContentMoveOperationService	10	Move, Copy, Sort, RecycleBin
IContentPublishOperationService	16	Publish, Unpublish, Scheduling
ContentPermissionManager	3	Get/Set permissions
ContentBlueprintManager	10	Blueprint CRUD
ContentService (facade)	2	Orchestration (MoveToRecycleBin, DeleteOfType)

---

5. Performance Results

Summary

• Overall improvement: -4.1% (29.5s → 28.3s total benchmark time)
• Batch operations: 10-54% faster
• Single-item operations: Stable or minor overhead

Top Improvements

Operation	Before	After	Change
Copy_Recursive_100Items	2,809ms	1,300ms	-53.7%
Delete_SingleItem	35ms	23ms	-34.3%
GetAncestors_DeepHierarchy	31ms	21ms	-32.3%
DeleteVersions_ByDate	178ms	131ms	-26.4%
Publish_BatchOf100	2,456ms	2,209ms	-10.1%

Regressions Requiring Investigation

Operation	Before	After	Change	Priority
HasChildren_100Nodes	65ms	157ms	+142%	High
GetById_Single	8ms	37ms	+363%	Low (variance)
GetVersionsSlim_Paged	8ms	12ms	+50%	Low

Root cause (HasChildren): Each call creates a new scope and database query. 100 calls = 100 round-trips. Solution documented in FurtherRefactoringRecommendations.md.

---

6. Critical Review Process

Each phase underwent multiple critical reviews before implementation:

Phase	Review Rounds	Issues Found	Issues Fixed
0	3	12	12
1	5	18	18
2	4	8	8
3	3	15	15
4	2	8	8
5	2	6	6
6	4	10	10
7	3	11	11
8	6	14	14

Total: 32 review rounds, 102 issues identified and resolved before implementation.

Key Issues Caught in Reviews

• Nested scope creation in batch operations (Phase 1)
• TOCTOU race condition in Rollback (Phase 3)
• Missing read locks for version queries (Phase 3)
• Double enumeration bug in blueprint queries (Phase 7)
• Empty array edge case that could delete all blueprints (Phase 7)
• Thread-safety issues in ContentSettings accessor (Phase 5)

---

7. Deferred Items

The following items from the original design were not implemented:

N+1 Query Optimizations (Planned, Not Implemented)

Method	Purpose	Status
GetIdsForKeys(Guid[] keys)	Batch key-to-id resolution	Deferred
GetSchedulesByContentIds(int[] ids)	Batch schedule lookups	Deferred
ArePathsPublished(int[] contentIds)	Batch path validation	Deferred
GetParents(int[] contentIds)	Batch ancestor lookups	Deferred

Rationale: Core refactoring prioritized over performance optimizations. These are documented in FurtherRefactoringRecommendations.md.

Memory Allocation Optimizations (Planned, Not Implemented)

• StringBuilder pooling
• ArrayPool for temporary arrays
• Span-based string operations
• Hoisted lambdas for hot paths

Rationale: Performance benchmarks showed overall improvement without these optimizations. They remain opportunities for future work.

---

8. Discrepancies from Original Plan

Item	Plan	Actual	Explanation
ContentService lines	~990	923	More code removed than estimated
ContentPublishOperationService	~800 lines	1,758 lines	Publishing complexity underestimated; includes all CommitDocumentChanges logic
Interface method count	5 public interfaces	5 interfaces + 2 managers	Managers promoted to public for DI resolvability
Performance tests	15	16	Additional DI registration test added
Benchmarks	33	33	Matched

---

9. Documentation Artifacts

All phases produced comprehensive documentation:

Document Type	Count	Location
Implementation plans	9	docs/plans/*-implementation.md
Phase summaries	9	docs/plans/*-summary-1.md
Critical reviews	33	docs/plans/*-critical-review-*.md
Performance report	1	docs/plans/PerformanceBenchmarks.md
Recommendations	1	docs/plans/FurtherRefactoringRecommendations.md
Design document	1	docs/plans/2025-12-19-contentservice-refactor-design.md

---

10. Recommendations for Next Steps

Immediate (High Priority)

1. Fix HasChildren regression - Implement batch HasChildren(IEnumerable<int>) (2-4 hours)
2. Merge to main - All gates passed, ready for integration

Short-term

1. Implement planned N+1 batch methods (4-8 hours each)
2. Add lock contract documentation to public interfaces
3. Consider splitting ContentPublishOperationService (1,758 lines exceeds 800-line target)

Long-term

1. Apply memory allocation optimizations to hot paths
2. Add benchmark stage to CI pipeline (20% regression threshold)
3. Evaluate similar refactoring for MediaService, MemberService

---

11. Success Criteria Assessment

From the original design document:

Criterion	Status
All existing tests pass	PASS (234/234)
No public API breaking changes	PASS
ContentService reduced to ~990 lines	PASS (923 lines)
Each new service independently testable	PASS (135 new tests)
Notification ordering matches current behavior	PASS
All 80+ IContentService methods mapped	PASS

---

12. Conclusion

The ContentService refactoring achieved all primary objectives:

1. Maintainability: 3,823-line monolith reduced to 923-line facade
2. Testability: 7 independently testable services with 135 new tests
3. Performance: 4.1% overall improvement, batch operations 10-54% faster
4. Compatibility: Zero breaking changes, all 234 tests passing
5. Quality: 32 critical review rounds, 102 issues caught before implementation

The refactoring establishes a pattern for future service decomposition and provides a solid foundation for addressing the remaining N+1 optimizations identified in the original design.

---

Files Modified: 47 Lines Added: ~5,500 Lines Removed: ~3,200 Net Change: +2,300 lines (mostly tests and documentation) Commits: 63