* Run code cleanup * Dotnet format benchmarks project * Fix up Test.Common * Run dotnet format + manual cleanup * Run code cleanup for unit tests * Run dotnet format * Fix up errors * Manual cleanup of Unit test project * Update tests/Umbraco.Tests.Benchmarks/HexStringBenchmarks.cs Co-authored-by: Mole <nikolajlauridsen@protonmail.ch> * Update tests/Umbraco.Tests.Integration/Testing/TestDbMeta.cs Co-authored-by: Mole <nikolajlauridsen@protonmail.ch> * Update tests/Umbraco.Tests.Benchmarks/TypeFinderBenchmarks.cs Co-authored-by: Mole <nikolajlauridsen@protonmail.ch> * Update tests/Umbraco.Tests.Integration/Testing/UmbracoIntegrationTest.cs Co-authored-by: Mole <nikolajlauridsen@protonmail.ch> * Update tests/Umbraco.Tests.Integration/Umbraco.Core/Events/EventAggregatorTests.cs Co-authored-by: Mole <nikolajlauridsen@protonmail.ch> * Fix according to review * Fix after merge * Fix errors Co-authored-by: Nikolaj Geisle <niko737@edu.ucl.dk> Co-authored-by: Mole <nikolajlauridsen@protonmail.ch> Co-authored-by: Zeegaan <nge@umbraco.dk>
295 lines
13 KiB
C#
295 lines
13 KiB
C#
// Copyright (c) Umbraco.
|
|
// See LICENSE for more details.
|
|
|
|
using System;
|
|
using System.Collections.Generic;
|
|
using System.Linq;
|
|
using System.Threading;
|
|
using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;
|
|
using NUnit.Framework;
|
|
using Umbraco.Cms.Core.Models;
|
|
using Umbraco.Cms.Core.Services;
|
|
using Umbraco.Cms.Infrastructure.Persistence;
|
|
using Umbraco.Cms.Tests.Common.Builders;
|
|
using Umbraco.Cms.Tests.Common.Testing;
|
|
using Umbraco.Cms.Tests.Integration.Testing;
|
|
using Umbraco.Extensions;
|
|
using Constants = Umbraco.Cms.Core.Constants;
|
|
using IScope = Umbraco.Cms.Infrastructure.Scoping.IScope;
|
|
|
|
namespace Umbraco.Cms.Tests.Integration.Umbraco.Infrastructure.Services
|
|
{
|
|
// these tests tend to fail from time to time esp. on VSTS
|
|
//
|
|
// read
|
|
// Lock Time-out: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms172402.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
|
|
// http://support.x-tensive.com/question/5242/strange-locking-exceptions-with-sqlserverce
|
|
// http://debuggingblog.com/wp/2009/05/07/high-cpu-usage-and-windows-forms-application-hang-with-sqlce-database-and-the-sqlcelocktimeoutexception/
|
|
//
|
|
// tried to increase it via connection string or via SET LOCK_TIMEOUT
|
|
// but still, the test fails on VSTS in most cases, so now ignoring it,
|
|
// as I could not figure out _why_ and it does not look like we are
|
|
// causing it, getting into __sysObjects locks, no idea why
|
|
[TestFixture]
|
|
[UmbracoTest(Database = UmbracoTestOptions.Database.NewSchemaPerTest, Logger = UmbracoTestOptions.Logger.Console)]
|
|
public class ThreadSafetyServiceTest : UmbracoIntegrationTest
|
|
{
|
|
private IContentService ContentService => GetRequiredService<IContentService>();
|
|
|
|
private IMediaService MediaService => GetRequiredService<IMediaService>();
|
|
|
|
private IContentTypeService ContentTypeService => GetRequiredService<IContentTypeService>();
|
|
|
|
[SetUp]
|
|
public void SetUp()
|
|
{
|
|
CreateTestData();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
private const int MaxThreadCount = 20;
|
|
|
|
private void Save(ContentService service, IContent content)
|
|
{
|
|
using (IScope scope = ScopeProvider.CreateScope())
|
|
{
|
|
if (ScopeAccessor.AmbientScope.Database.DatabaseType.IsSqlServer())
|
|
{
|
|
ScopeAccessor.AmbientScope.Database.Execute("SET LOCK_TIMEOUT 60000");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
service.Save(content);
|
|
scope.Complete();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
private void Save(MediaService service, IMedia media)
|
|
{
|
|
using (IScope scope = ScopeProvider.CreateScope())
|
|
{
|
|
if (ScopeAccessor.AmbientScope.Database.DatabaseType.IsSqlServer())
|
|
{
|
|
ScopeAccessor.AmbientScope.Database.Execute("SET LOCK_TIMEOUT 60000");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
service.Save(media);
|
|
scope.Complete();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
private ManualResetEventSlim TraceLocks()
|
|
{
|
|
var done = new ManualResetEventSlim(false);
|
|
|
|
// comment out to trace locks
|
|
return done;
|
|
|
|
// new Thread(() =>
|
|
// {
|
|
// using (var scope = ScopeProvider.CreateScope())
|
|
// while (done.IsSet == false)
|
|
// {
|
|
// var db = scope.Database;
|
|
// var info = db.Query<dynamic>("SELECT * FROM sys.lock_information;");
|
|
// Console.WriteLine("LOCKS:");
|
|
// foreach (var row in info)
|
|
// {
|
|
// Console.WriteLine("> " + row.request_spid + " " + row.resource_type + " " + row.resource_description + " " + row.request_mode + " " + row.resource_table + " " + row.resource_table_id + " " + row.request_status);
|
|
// }
|
|
// Thread.Sleep(50);
|
|
// }
|
|
// }).Start();
|
|
// return done;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
[Test]
|
|
public void Ensure_All_Threads_Execute_Successfully_Content_Service()
|
|
{
|
|
if (Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("UMBRACO_TMP") != null)
|
|
{
|
|
Assert.Ignore("Do not run on VSTS.");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ILogger<ThreadSafetyServiceTest> log = GetRequiredService<ILogger<ThreadSafetyServiceTest>>();
|
|
|
|
// the ServiceContext in that each repository in a service (i.e. ContentService) is a singleton
|
|
var contentService = (ContentService)ContentService;
|
|
|
|
var threads = new List<Thread>();
|
|
var exceptions = new List<Exception>();
|
|
|
|
log.LogInformation("Starting...");
|
|
|
|
ManualResetEventSlim done = TraceLocks();
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < MaxThreadCount; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
var t = new Thread(() =>
|
|
{
|
|
try
|
|
{
|
|
// NOTE: This is NULL because we have supressed the execution context flow.
|
|
// If we don't do that we will get various exceptions because we're trying to run concurrent threads
|
|
// against an ambient context which cannot be done due to the rules of scope creation and completion.
|
|
// But this works in v8 without the supression!? Why?
|
|
// In v8 the value of the AmbientScope is simply the current CallContext (i.e. AsyncLocal) Value which
|
|
// is not a mutable Stack like we are maintaining now. This means that for each child thread
|
|
// in v8, that thread will see it's own CallContext Scope value that it set and not the 'true'
|
|
// ambient Scope like we do now.
|
|
// So although the test passes in v8, there's actually some strange things occuring because Scopes
|
|
// are being created and disposed concurrently and out of order.
|
|
var currentScope = ScopeAccessor.AmbientScope;
|
|
log.LogInformation("[{ThreadId}] Current Scope? {CurrentScope}", Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId, currentScope?.GetDebugInfo());
|
|
Assert.IsNull(currentScope);
|
|
|
|
string name1 = "test-" + Guid.NewGuid();
|
|
IContent content1 = contentService.Create(name1, -1, "umbTextpage");
|
|
|
|
log.LogInformation("[{ThreadId}] Saving content #1.", Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
|
|
Save(contentService, content1);
|
|
|
|
Thread.Sleep(100); // quick pause for maximum overlap!
|
|
|
|
string name2 = "test-" + Guid.NewGuid();
|
|
IContent content2 = contentService.Create(name2, -1, "umbTextpage");
|
|
|
|
log.LogInformation("[{ThreadId}] Saving content #2.", Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
|
|
Save(contentService, content2);
|
|
}
|
|
catch (Exception e)
|
|
{
|
|
// throw;
|
|
lock (exceptions)
|
|
{
|
|
exceptions.Add(e);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
threads.Add(t);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// See NOTE above, we must supress flow here to be able to run concurrent threads,
|
|
// else the AsyncLocal value from this current context will flow to the child threads.
|
|
using (ExecutionContext.SuppressFlow())
|
|
{
|
|
// start all threads
|
|
log.LogInformation("Starting threads");
|
|
threads.ForEach(x => x.Start());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// wait for all to complete
|
|
log.LogInformation("Joining threads");
|
|
threads.ForEach(x => x.Join());
|
|
|
|
done.Set();
|
|
|
|
log.LogInformation("Checking exceptions");
|
|
if (exceptions.Count == 0)
|
|
{
|
|
// now look up all items, there should be 40!
|
|
IEnumerable<IContent> items = contentService.GetRootContent();
|
|
Assert.AreEqual(2 * MaxThreadCount, items.Count());
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
throw new Exception("Exceptions!", exceptions.First()); // rethrow the first one...
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
[Test]
|
|
public void Ensure_All_Threads_Execute_Successfully_Media_Service()
|
|
{
|
|
if (Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("UMBRACO_TMP") != null)
|
|
{
|
|
Assert.Ignore("Do not run on VSTS.");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ILogger<ThreadSafetyServiceTest> log = GetRequiredService<ILogger<ThreadSafetyServiceTest>>();
|
|
|
|
// mimick the ServiceContext in that each repository in a service (i.e. ContentService) is a singleton
|
|
var mediaService = (MediaService)MediaService;
|
|
|
|
var threads = new List<Thread>();
|
|
var exceptions = new List<Exception>();
|
|
|
|
log.LogInformation("Starting...");
|
|
|
|
ManualResetEventSlim done = TraceLocks();
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < MaxThreadCount; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
var t = new Thread(() =>
|
|
{
|
|
try
|
|
{
|
|
// NOTE: This is NULL because we have supressed the execution context flow.
|
|
// If we don't do that we will get various exceptions because we're trying to run concurrent threads
|
|
// against an ambient context which cannot be done due to the rules of scope creation and completion.
|
|
// But this works in v8 without the supression!? Why?
|
|
// In v8 the value of the AmbientScope is simply the current CallContext (i.e. AsyncLocal) Value which
|
|
// is not a mutable Stack like we are maintaining now. This means that for each child thread
|
|
// in v8, that thread will see it's own CallContext Scope value that it set and not the 'true'
|
|
// ambient Scope like we do now.
|
|
// So although the test passes in v8, there's actually some strange things occuring because Scopes
|
|
// are being created and disposed concurrently and out of order.
|
|
var currentScope = ScopeAccessor.AmbientScope;
|
|
log.LogInformation("[{ThreadId}] Current Scope? {CurrentScope}", Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId, currentScope?.GetDebugInfo());
|
|
Assert.IsNull(currentScope);
|
|
|
|
string name1 = "test-" + Guid.NewGuid();
|
|
IMedia media1 = mediaService.CreateMedia(name1, -1, Constants.Conventions.MediaTypes.Folder);
|
|
log.LogInformation("[{0}] Saving media #1.", Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
|
|
Save(mediaService, media1);
|
|
|
|
Thread.Sleep(100); // quick pause for maximum overlap!
|
|
|
|
string name2 = "test-" + Guid.NewGuid();
|
|
IMedia media2 = mediaService.CreateMedia(name2, -1, Constants.Conventions.MediaTypes.Folder);
|
|
log.LogInformation("[{0}] Saving media #2.", Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
|
|
Save(mediaService, media2);
|
|
}
|
|
catch (Exception e)
|
|
{
|
|
lock (exceptions)
|
|
{
|
|
exceptions.Add(e);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
threads.Add(t);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// See NOTE above, we must supress flow here to be able to run concurrent threads,
|
|
// else the AsyncLocal value from this current context will flow to the child threads.
|
|
using (ExecutionContext.SuppressFlow())
|
|
{
|
|
// start all threads
|
|
threads.ForEach(x => x.Start());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// wait for all to complete
|
|
threads.ForEach(x => x.Join());
|
|
|
|
done.Set();
|
|
|
|
if (exceptions.Count == 0)
|
|
{
|
|
// now look up all items, there should be 40!
|
|
IEnumerable<IMedia> items = mediaService.GetRootMedia();
|
|
Assert.AreEqual(2 * MaxThreadCount, items.Count());
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
throw new Exception("Exceptions!", exceptions.First()); // rethrow the first one...
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public void CreateTestData()
|
|
{
|
|
// Create and Save ContentType "umbTextpage" -> 1045
|
|
ContentType contentType = ContentTypeBuilder.CreateSimpleContentType("umbTextpage", "Textpage");
|
|
contentType.Key = new Guid("1D3A8E6E-2EA9-4CC1-B229-1AEE19821522");
|
|
ContentTypeService.Save(contentType);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|